Cell type | σ in μm | original MD | AMD in μm/min | % | AMD (smoothed) | % |
---|
sc | 3 | 0.181 | 0.423 | 234 | 0.125 | 69 |
sc | 4.5 | | 0.578 | 320 | 0.151 | 84 |
sc | 6 | | 0.747 | 414 | 0.181 | 100 |
sc | 7.5 | | 0.921 | 510 | 0.218 | 121 |
mc | 3 | 0.622 | 0.723 | 116 | 0.465 | 75 |
mc | 4.5 | | 0.829 | 133 | 0.473 | 76 |
mc | 6 | | 0.956 | 154 | 0.484 | 78 |
mc | 7.5 | | 1.099 | 177 | 0.499 | 80 |
fc | 3 | 1.787 | 1.821 | 102 | 1.589 | 89 |
fc | 4.5 | | 1.860 | 104 | 1.591 | 89 |
fc | 6 | | 1.923 | 108 | 1.597 | 89 |
fc | 7.5 | | 1.985 | 111 | 1.598 | 89 |
- Three cell types where tested (slow cell (sc), medium fast cell (mc), fast cell (fc)). The centroid positions where artificially varied within a standard deviation (σ, both axes) of 3 to 7.5 μm around the real centroid and the average mean displacement (AMD) computed for each set of varied tracks (200 tracks per setting). Variation of centroid positions resulted in overestimation of cell speeds, which was most pronounced for the slowest cell. Smoothing of "noisy" cell tracks by a centered moving average filter (window size 5) tended to underestimate MD values to varying degrees.